Tag Archive for: University of California

ICYMI: Part IV – Urban Food Futures Seminar Highlights

The following is a summary of Session 4: Urban Agriculture Extension & Research, which took place on May 5th, 2026, 10-11:30 am PST / 1-2:30 pm EST

Urban Food Futures, Part 4: How Extension is Advancing Urban Agriculture Programs in Cities

The fourth session of the NUREC Urban Food Futures Seminar Series brought the conversation firmly into practice—exploring how urban agriculture Extension professionals are building and supporting urban farming programs across diverse communities.

While earlier sessions focused on defining urban agriculture and its ecological role, this webinar asked a more applied question: what does it take to make urban agriculture work on the ground?

Speakers from Rutgers Cooperative Extension, UMass Extension, and Cornell Cooperative Extension shared real-world examples of programming, technical assistance, and research. Together, they illustrated how urban agriculture Extension is evolving to meet the needs of growers, communities, and cities.

Community Engagement as the Foundation of Urban Farming Programs

In New Jersey, Claudia Geneva’s work with Rutgers Cooperative Extension highlights how successful urban farming programs begin with community relationships. Gardens in public parks, seed libraries, and compost education initiatives create spaces where learning and food access intersect.

Programs also extend into urban farmer training and workforce development, including initiatives like the Urban Grower Training Program and business management education for new producers. Youth programs help build leadership pipelines, while multilingual outreach—including Spanish-language education and digital content—ensures broader access.

This approach reflects a core principle of urban agriculture Extension: programs must be culturally relevant, locally grounded, and relationship-driven to be effective.

Urban agriculture, in this sense, is not simply about growing food—it is about building community through shared spaces and knowledge.

Technical Assistance and the Role of Urban Agriculture Extension

At UMass Extension, Olivia Golden presented a model that emphasizes hands-on technical assistance for urban farms. The Urban Mentor Farm Program works intensively with a small number of farms each season, providing ongoing support through site visits, troubleshooting, and collaborative problem-solving.

This type of Extension-based technical assistance supports growers in key areas such as:

  • Soil health and fertility
  • Pest identification and management
  • Season extension and high tunnel production
  • Food safety and farm operations

Through this work, a critical issue has emerged: urban soils do not behave like conventional agricultural soils.

Urban farms often rely on constructed soils with high organic matter, which can produce confusing or inconsistent results in standard soil tests. This highlights an important gap in urban soils research, where existing agricultural tools may not fully meet the needs of urban growers.

These findings reinforce the importance of long-term Extension relationships, where support evolves alongside the farm and contributes to identifying new research priorities.

Scaling Urban Agriculture Extension in Complex City Systems

In New York City, Cornell Cooperative Extension is supporting more than 65 commercial urban farms—demonstrating how urban agriculture Extension programs operate at scale in dense urban environments.

Their work includes:

  • Technical support for soil management and pest control
  • Farmer networking and peer learning opportunities
  • Engagement in policy discussions affecting urban agriculture

A major focus is the challenge of managing constructed urban soils, which differ significantly from traditional agricultural systems. High organic matter and unique physical properties make it difficult to interpret soil test results using conventional methods.

At the same time, ongoing conversations around nutrient management have raised questions about nutrient leaching in urban agriculture systems. While soil tests may indicate high nutrient levels, current observations suggest that actual environmental risks may be relatively low compared to other urban land uses.

These findings point to a growing need for urban soils research that better reflects real-world conditions—an area where Extension, research institutions, and farmers must collaborate closely.

Urban Soils Research: A Shared Priority

Across all three regions, one issue stood out: urban soils are a critical and unresolved challenge in urban agriculture.

Unlike conventional soils, urban soils are often:

  • Constructed from imported materials
  • High in organic matter
  • Influenced by past land use and infrastructure

As a result, key questions remain:

  • Are current soil testing methods accurate for urban systems?
  • How do nutrients behave in high-organic-matter soils?
  • What are the actual environmental impacts of urban farming practices?

These uncertainties highlight a major opportunity for advancing urban agriculture research and Extension collaboration. They also reinforce the idea that urban farms, despite these unknowns, may have a lower environmental impact than many other urban land uses.

What This Means for Urban Agriculture Extension

This session makes clear that Extension is central to the growth and success of urban agriculture programs nationwide. From community engagement to technical assistance and policy support, Extension professionals are already shaping how urban farming functions in practice.

At the same time, the work is evolving. Urban agriculture demands approaches that are more relational, adaptive, and interdisciplinary than traditional models. It requires Extension to operate in spaces where research is still developing, especially in areas like urban soils and nutrient management.

It also calls for a broader understanding of value. Urban farming programs provide food, but they also support education, public health, environmental stewardship, and community resilience. Recognizing and communicating these benefits is increasingly important for sustaining support and investment.

Equity remains foundational. Programs that succeed are those that reflect the communities they serve—through culturally relevant content, multilingual access, and meaningful opportunities for youth and new farmers.

Looking ahead, a key priority is coordination. Efforts like the NUREC Urban Data Hub offer a pathway to better connect urban agriculture Extension programs, share data, and align research and practice across regions.

Looking Ahead

Urban agriculture is continuing to expand—and so is the role of Extension in supporting it. The challenges ahead are technical, social, and systemic, but they also present opportunities for innovation and collaboration.

This session highlighted a defining reality: urban agriculture succeeds not because it is simple, but because Extension professionals are willing to work within its complexity.

In doing so, they are not only supporting urban farming programs—they are helping to shape the future of urban agriculture in cities across the country.


Speaker Bios

Sam Anderson, MS
Urban Agriculture Specialist, Cornell Cooperative Extension

Sam is an urban agriculture specialist with Cornell Cooperative Extension’s Harvest NY team. He provides technical assistance and educational programming for urban farmers throughout New York City. His work is primarily focused on soil health and integrated pest management (IPM) for vegetable crops, with an emphasis on uplifting the expertise of historically underserved urban farmers.

Links:

  • University Profile: https://cals.cornell.edu/people/sam-anderson

Olivia Golden
Urban Agriculture Educator, UMass Amherst

Olivia Golden is an Urban Agriculture Extension Educator with the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where she supports community-driven food and environmental initiatives. She holds a master’s degree in Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning and brings experience in environmental education, sustainable agriculture, and community-based research.

Links:

Claudia Urdanivia, MS, MA
County Extension Dept. Head and Agriculture & Natural Resources County Agent

Claudia Urdanivia is an urban agriculture educator and anthropologist committed to advancing equitable, community‑driven food systems. Her work spans extension education, youth development, and community garden support, with a strong foundation in public health, food justice, and culturally rooted agricultural knowledge.

Links:

ICYMI: Part III – Urban Food Futures Seminar Highlights

The following is a summary of Session 3: Urban Agriculture, Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services, which took place on April 14th, 2026, 10-11:30 am PST / 1-2:30 pm EST

Urban Agriculture as Social Infrastructure: Lessons from Session Three of the Urban Food Futures Series

Urban agriculture is often discussed in terms of yields, efficiency, or economic viability. But during Session Three of NUREC’s Urban Food Futures Seminar Series, speakers collectively made a compelling case for a broader—and more impactful—frame: urban agriculture as social infrastructure.

Focusing on the social and economic impacts of urban agriculture, this session highlighted how community gardens, urban farms, and grassroots food projects function as sites of cultural continuity, political organizing, public health support, and community resilience—especially in cities shaped by inequality and ongoing crisis.

For Extension researchers and practitioners, the session offered important insights into how urban agriculture should be supported, studied, and sustained moving forward.

Urban Agriculture Is More Than Food Production

Dr. Antonio Roman‑Alcalá (California State University, East Bay; Agroecology Organizing Project) opened the session by emphasizing that urban agriculture generates multiple forms of value beyond food.

These include:

  • Cultural and agro‑biodiversity, especially through the foodways of migrant and diasporic communities
  • Social cohesion and place‑making in neighborhoods affected by displacement and precarity
  • Environmental stewardship rooted in lived experience
  • Political capacity building through mutual aid, food justice, and collective organizing

Urban agriculture, Roman‑Alcalá argued, often serves as an entry point—inviting people to engage with food systems hands‑on, while also revealing the limits of localized food production within broader economic and political structures.

For Extension, this underscores the need to avoid framing urban agriculture solely as a technical or entrepreneurial endeavor. Its deepest impacts often occur where community relationships, values, and power are being built.

The Central Barrier: Land and Power

A key through‑line of the session was the role of land access. Across decades of practice and research, challenges related to land tenure—short‑term leases, speculative markets, and private property regimes—remain the biggest constraint on urban agriculture’s long‑term impact.

Roman‑Alcalá emphasized that:

  • Temporary or incentive‑based land access often reproduces inequality
  • Market‑driven land systems limit food justice outcomes
  • More transformative approaches include community land trusts, public land stewardship, and land reform frameworks

Without secure land access, urban agriculture remains vulnerable—no matter how successful it is socially or ecologically.

For Extension practitioners, land policy and governance are not peripheral issues. They are central to enabling sustainable, community‑led food systems.

Community Gardens as Social Infrastructure

Dr. H. Shellae Versey (Fordham University) brought a psychological and community‑based lens to the conversation, drawing from qualitative research conducted with Black farmers and community gardeners across multiple states.

In these interviews, growers consistently described community gardens not just as places to grow food, but as:

  • Spaces for dignity, healing, and leadership development
  • Informal safety nets during moments of crisis
  • Sites for political education and voice
  • Less stigmatizing alternatives to formal food assistance

Crucially, these themes emerged organically. Gardeners spoke about survival, care, and responsibility to their communities, not program metrics.

Versey framed community gardens as a form of social infrastructure—similar to libraries or parks—providing public value that far exceeds their physical footprint.

For Extension, this reinforces the importance of recognizing social and psychological outcomes as core impacts, not secondary benefits.

Gardening Across Acute and Chronic Crises

Lucy Diekmann and Laura Vollmer (UC Cooperative Extension) expanded the discussion by situating urban gardening within both acute crises and chronic structural conditions.

Drawing from a literature review published in Crisis Gardening: A Global Perspective, they described two overlapping contexts:

  • Acute crises: pandemics, wars, natural disasters—moments when gardening often receives increased attention and support
  • Chronic crises: food apartheid, housing insecurity, environmental injustice—long‑standing conditions that shape everyday life

While gardening during acute crises can increase food access and community connection, Diekmann and Vollmer showed that the greatest and most enduring benefits emerge when gardening is embedded within long‑term struggles for food justice and sovereignty.

This distinction matters for Extension. Short‑term surges of funding or interest—followed by withdrawal—undermine the continuity that community‑based food systems require.

Implications for Extension Research and Practice

Across perspectives, several key takeaways emerged for Extension professionals working in urban contexts.

1. Redefine What “Success” Looks Like

Traditional metrics—pounds harvested, revenue generated, number of participants—capture only part of the picture. Extension programs should also document:

  • Community governance and leadership
  • Cultural relevance of food
  • Stability of land access
  • Strength of social networks
  • Contributions to food sovereignty and resilience

2. Engage Directly with Land and Policy

Land access, zoning, and governance shape every outcome in urban agriculture. Extension can play a vital role by:

  • Supporting community land trusts and shared stewardship models
  • Translating land‑use policy into accessible guidance
  • Convening food, housing, and planning stakeholders
  • Documenting unintended harms of “temporary use” approaches

3. Center Participatory Research and Co‑Creation

The strongest insights presented in this session came from:

  • Oral histories and qualitative methods
  • Community‑defined research questions
  • Long‑term partnerships built on trust

Extension is uniquely positioned to bridge academic research, lived experience, and practice.

4. Plan Beyond Crisis Cycles

Urban agriculture cannot be mobilized only during emergencies. Sustainable impact requires:

  • Baseline public investment
  • Integration with health, housing, and climate strategies
  • Capacity building before, during, and after crises

5. Reject False Binaries

Speakers challenged common divides—urban vs. rural, market vs. community, emergency vs. long‑term change. Instead, they pointed to the importance of interdependence, solidarity, and connection across food systems.

Looking Ahead

Session Three made clear that urban agriculture is not a niche or temporary solution. It is a longstanding, evolving practice that sits at the intersection of food, land, health, and justice.

For Extension and research institutions committed to equitable urban futures, the challenge is not whether to engage with urban agriculture—but how deeply, how thoughtfully, and how sustainably.

As NUREC continues to convene conversations and build national networks around urban food systems, these insights will be critical for shaping research agendas, Extension practice, and policy engagement that truly serve urban communities.


Speaker Bios

Antonio Roman‑Alcalá, MS

Assistant Professor, California State University, East Bay
Director, Agroecology Organizing Project

Antonio Roman‑Alcalá is an educator, researcher, and long‑time urban agriculture practitioner focused on agroecology, food sovereignty, land access, and social movements. He co‑founded San Francisco’s Alemany Farm and the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance, and brings over two decades of experience connecting grassroots organizing, policy, and scholarship in urban food systems.

Links:

H. Shellae Versey, PhD

Associate Professor of Psychology, Fordham University
Principal Investigator, Critical Health + Social Ecology Urban Living Lab

Dr. Shellae Versey is a community and social psychologist whose research examines how place, policy, and structural inequities shape health, aging, and access to basic needs such as food and housing. Her work centers the lived experiences of Black and other marginalized urban communities, including research on urban agriculture as a pathway to food sovereignty and community resilience.

Links:

Lucy Diekmann, PhD

Urban Agriculture and Food Systems Advisor
University of California Cooperative Extension (Santa Clara & San Mateo Counties)

Dr. Lucy Diekmann is an Extension advisor and researcher working at the intersection of urban agriculture, food security, and food justice in high‑cost metropolitan regions. Her work examines how community and home gardening contribute to nutrition, social connection, and resilience, and she is a contributing author to Crisis Gardening: A Global Perspective.

Links:

Laura Vollmer, MPH, RD

Community Nutrition and Health Advisor
University of California Cooperative Extension (San Francisco, San Mateo & Santa Clara Counties)

Laura Vollmer is a registered dietitian and Extension advisor specializing in nutrition security, community food systems, and equitable food access. Her work integrates public health, evaluation, and community‑based practice, including research on gardening and food systems during acute and chronic crises.

Links:

© Copyright 2024 - NUREC National Urban Research & Extension Center